Langer v. Garay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Langer v. Garay

30 A.D.2d 943, 293 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3244

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 3, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 943 (Langer v. Garay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langer v. Garay, 30 A.D.2d 943, 293 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3244 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of plaintiff returnable on September 17, 1968, granted to the extent of striking the appearance of the named firm of attorneys as counsel in behalf of the corporate defendant, dismissing the appeal of the defendants insofar as it relates to that portion of the order, entered May 20, 1968, denying their motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, and vacating the stay granted herein by order of this court filed June 18, 1968, and motion otherwise denied, without costs, without prejudice, however, to the rights and remedies of the corporation with respect to the fees, if any, paid by it to the said firm of attorneys and to the rights and remedies of the parties, if any, with respect to alleged violations of the conditions of the stay directed pursuant to the order of this court rendered June 18, 1968, including upon the bond or undertaking filed pursuant to such order. (See determination of this court in Langer v. Garay (30 A D 2d 942.) Concur— Eager, J. P., Steuer, Tilzer, Rabin and Macken, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of plaintiff returnable on September 17, 1968, granted to the extent of striking the appearance of the named firm of attorneys as counsel in behalf of the corporate defendant, dismissing the appeal of the defendants insofar as it relates to that portion of the order, entered May 20, 1968, denying their motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, and vacating the stay granted herein by order of this court filed June 18, 1968, and motion otherwise denied, without costs, without prejudice, however, to the rights and remedies of the corporation with respect to the fees, if any, paid by it to the said firm of attorneys and to the rights and remedies of the parties, if any, with respect to alleged violations of the conditions of the stay directed pursuant to the order of this court rendered June 18, 1968, including upon the bond or undertaking filed pursuant to such order. (See determination of this court in Langer v. Garay (30 A D 2d 942.) Concur— Eager, J. P., Steuer, Tilzer, Rabin and Macken, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 943, 293 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langer-v-garay-nyappdiv-1968.