Langel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Langel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

614 So. 2d 1218, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3278, 1993 WL 74271

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 17, 1993

DocketNo. 92-0700

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 614 So. 2d 1218 (Langel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 614 So. 2d 1218, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3278, 1993 WL 74271 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We summarily affirm pursuant to rule 9.315(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

In so doing, we find that appellants have failed to raise any justiciable issue in this appeal. Appellants impermissibly seek to reargue issues they had raised and argued, and which were rejected, in a previous appeal. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Langel, 587 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We therefore award attorneys’ fees as costs to appellees pursuant to 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (1991). On remand, the trial court shall determine a reasonable fee for having to respond to this appeal.

AFFIRMED BUT REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS TO AWARD FEES.

HERSEY, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI