Kurzman v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

623 So. 2d 1249, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10036, 1993 WL 382634
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 1993·No. No. 93-2546·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Leblanc v. State Farm, 616 So.2d 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Langel v. Aetna, 614 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); and Fulton v. State, 614 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

GLICKSTEIN, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kurzman v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 623 So. 2d 1249, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10036, 1993 WL 382634 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

623 So. 2d 1249 (Kurzman v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fulton v. State
614 So. 2d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Langel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
614 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
616 So. 2d 621 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)