Lang v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Lang v. State

190 S.W.2d 146, 190 S.W. 146, 80 Tex. Crim. 272, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 316

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 1, 1916

DocketNo. 4193.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 190 S.W.2d 146 (Lang v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lang v. State, 190 S.W.2d 146, 190 S.W. 146, 80 Tex. Crim. 272, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 316 (Tex. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a felony conviction. Appellant gave notice of appeal, and while court was in session entered into an appeal bond, approved by the sheriff and the trial judge. Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney General to dismiss the appeal because the jurisdiction of this court can not be thus attached; that in order to attach the jurisdiction of this court under such circumstances a recognizance must be entered into during term time, or if this be not done during the term, he can obtain "his release, though the appeal is pending before the Court of Criminal Appeals, by entering into an appeal bond as prescribed by the statute. Article 902 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that where a party desires to appeal and takes the necessary steps to accomplish that, and desires not to remain in jail pending the appeal, he may enter into a recognizance pending such appeal, provided it is in term .time and he was in custody at the time. Article 904 provides that if this be not done in term time, he may secure his release from custody by entering into an appeal bond; approved by the sheriff and the.trial judge, in vacation. These statutes have been construed by this court. See the recent case of Bloss v. State, 79 Texas Crim. Rep., 617, 187 S. W. Rep., 487. It seems to be the purpose and the wording in fact of our statute that recognizances can only be entered into during term time, and that in order to consummate an appeal to this court, the trial court being in session, the party can not give an appeal bond; he must enter into a recognizance. Whether this be a hardship or not, it seems to be the plain statutory enactment. Under no decision that we have been able to find can a party, in a felony, after term time, enter into a recognizance. In that character of case the Legislature provides that he may give an appeal bond. But in cases of this character the jurisdiction of this court can not attach without statutory obligation was entered into as required by law. It may he well enough for the Legislature to change this rule, but not having done so, this court can not do so.

Under the record as made the jurisdiction of this court does not attach, and the appeal must, therefore, be dismissed, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a felony conviction. Appellant gave notice of appeal, and while court was in session entered into an appeal bond, approved by the sheriff and the trial judge. Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney General to dismiss the appeal because the jurisdiction of this court can not be thus attached; that in order to attach the jurisdiction of this court under such circumstances a recognizance must be entered into during term time, or if this be not done during the term, he can obtain "his release, though the appeal is pending before the Court of Criminal Appeals, by entering into an appeal bond as prescribed by the statute. Article 902 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that where a party desires to appeal and takes the necessary steps to accomplish that, and desires not to remain in jail pending the appeal, he may enter into a recognizance pending such appeal, provided it is in term .time and he was in custody at the time. Article 904 provides that if this be not done in term time, he may secure his release from custody by entering into an appeal bond; approved by the sheriff and the.trial judge, in vacation. These statutes have been construed by this court. See the recent case of Bloss v. State, 79 Texas Crim. Rep., 617, 187 S. W. Rep., 487. It seems to be the purpose and the wording in fact of our statute that recognizances can only be entered into during term time, and that in order to consummate an appeal to this court, the trial court being in session, the party can not give an appeal bond; he must enter into a recognizance. Whether this be a hardship or not, it seems to be the plain statutory enactment. Under no decision that we have been able to find can a party, in a felony, after term time, enter into a recognizance. In that character of case the Legislature provides that he may give an appeal bond. But in cases of this character the jurisdiction of this court can not attach without statutory obligation was entered into as required by law. It may he well enough for the Legislature to change this rule, but not having done so, this court can not do so.

Under the record as made the jurisdiction of this court does not attach, and the appeal must, therefore, be dismissed, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 S.W.2d 146, 190 S.W. 146, 80 Tex. Crim. 272, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lang-v-state-texcrimapp-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack