Bloss v. State

187 S.W. 487, 79 Tex. Crim. 617, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 208
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 7, 1916
DocketNo. 4109.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 187 S.W. 487 (Bloss v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloss v. State, 187 S.W. 487, 79 Tex. Crim. 617, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 208 (Tex. 1916).

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of pandering and his punishment assessed at five years confinement in the State penitentiary.

The record contains no bills of exception, and no statement of facts accompanies the transcript.

The indictment charges an offense, and under such circumstances there is no question presented we can review.

It is further made to appear that while the court was in session appellant, instead of entering into a recognizance, gave an appeal bond and was released from custody. Consequently, the State’s motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dawe v. State
185 S.W.2d 108 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1945)
Weaver v. State
17 S.W.2d 818 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
King v. State
203 S.W. 52 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Lang v. State
190 S.W.2d 146 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 S.W. 487, 79 Tex. Crim. 617, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloss-v-state-texcrimapp-1916.