Lang v. Commissioner

12 B.T.A. 435, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3527
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedJune 7, 1928
DocketDocket No. 14370.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 12 B.T.A. 435 (Lang v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lang v. Commissioner, 12 B.T.A. 435, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3527 (bta 1928).

Opinion

Trammell:

This is a proceeding for the redetermination of a deficiency in income tax for 1924 in the amount of $433.35. The deficiency arises from the action of the respondent in disallowing a deduction claimed in the amount of $9,000 on account of losses alleged to have been sustained by the petitioner during 1924 in the purchase of stock in the corporation.

ITNDINGS OJT PACT.

The petitioner is a resident of New York City. Commencing in the month of February, 1924, and ending in the month of August, 1924, the petitioner purchased stock in the American Repertoire Theatre Co., Inc., a New York corporation, for a total of $9,000. The corporation was organized for the purpose of producing theatrical attractions and plays. The corporation produced a play or drama written by Dr. William I. Sirovich and known as the Scheimers.” This play was produced by said corporation in 1924 and was a failure and was withdrawn from the stage after a short run. All of the assets of the corporation, such as scenery, costumes, property, etc., were disposed of for the purpose of raising funds to pay off the debts of the corporation incurred in the attempt to make a success of the play, which debts included actors’ salaries, expenses, etc. At no time were there any assets to be distributed to the stockholders. The stock became wholly worthless in 1924 and the petitioner is entitled to the deduction claimed in that year with respect thereto.

Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

COLLIMS v. COMMISSIONER
21 B.T.A. 210 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1930)
Lang v. Commissioner
12 B.T.A. 435 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 B.T.A. 435, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lang-v-commissioner-bta-1928.