Lang v. Colonial Pipeline Co.

383 F.2d 986, 11 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 447, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4581
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided November 8, 1967·No. No. 16667·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to join Colonial Pipeline Company of Pennsylvania as an indispensable party under [987] F.R.Civ.P. 19(b). Since the joinder would have ousted the court of jurisdiction on the basis of diversity of citizenship and the court could find no federal question involved, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, appellants’ complaint was dismissed.

We have carefully examined the record and can find no error.

We will affirm the order of the district court on its well reasoned opinion, Lang v. Colonial Pipeline Co., 266 F.Supp. 552 (E.D.Pa., 1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lang v. Colonial Pipeline Co., 383 F.2d 986, 11 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 447, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4581 (3d Cir. 1967).

383 F.2d 986 (Lang v. Colonial Pipeline Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson & Johnson v. Coopervision, Inc.
720 F. Supp. 1116 (D. Delaware, 1989)
Harry Dernick v. Bralorne Resources, Limited
639 F.2d 196 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Japan Petroleum Co.(Nigeria) Ltd. v. Ashland Oil
456 F. Supp. 831 (D. Delaware, 1978)
Rudisill v. Southern Railway Co.
424 F. Supp. 1102 (W.D. North Carolina, 1976)
H. Keith Zahn v. International Paper Company
469 F.2d 1033 (Second Circuit, 1972)
Weatherford v. Elizondo
52 F.R.D. 122 (S.D. Texas, 1971)