Laney v. Uecker
This text of 1997 ND 185 (Laney v. Uecker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 9/30/97 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1997 ND 185
Denise Laney, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Shawn Uecker, Defendant and Appellant
Civil No. 970076
Appeal from the District Court for Mercer County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James M. Vukelic, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Richard B. Baer (argued), of Richard B. Baer, P.C., 1003 E. Interstate Ave., P.O. Box 1221, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1221, for defendant and appellant.
R. Rick Maixner (argued), of Schmitz, Moench & Schmidt, 222 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 2076, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2076, for plaintiff and appellee.
Laney v. Uecker
[¶1] Shawn Uecker appeals from the trial court judgment awarding Denise Laney custody of their minor child. The trial court’s custody determination is a finding of fact which will not be set aside on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous. Huesers v. Huesers , 1997 ND 33, ¶6, 560 N.W.2d 219; Ternes v. Ternes , 555 N.W.2d 355, 357 (N.D. 1996). We conclude the trial court’s custody determination was not clearly erroneous. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 35.1(a)(2), N.D.R.App.P.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
William A. Neumann
Dale V. Sandstrom
Herbert L. Meschke
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1997 ND 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laney-v-uecker-nd-1997.