Lane v. Wynne

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 20, 2007·No. 06-1853·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1853

BRUCE E. LANE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL W. WYNNE, Secretary of the Air Force; LOCAL UNION 1092, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:04-cv-01051-PJM)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 20, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce E. Lane, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark D. Roth, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bruce E. Lane appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lane v. Wynne,

No. 8:04-cv-01051-PJM (D. Md. June 26, 2006). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lane v. Wynne, (4th Cir. 2007).

Lane v. Wynne (Lane v. Wynne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.