Lane v. Wynne

Fourth Circuit

Lane v. Wynne

218 F. App'x 262

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 20, 2007·No. No. 06-1853·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Bruce E. Lane appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lane v. Wynne, No. 8:04-cv-01051-PJM (D. Md. June 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Bruce E. Lane appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lane v. Wynne, No. 8:04-cv-01051-PJM (D. Md. June 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lane v. Wynne, 218 F. App'x 262 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

218 F. App'x 262 (Lane v. Wynne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.