Landry's Case

190 N.E.2d 208, 346 Mass. 762, 1963 Mass. LEXIS 749
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 2, 1963·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Decree reversed. The board adopted the findings of the single member that the claimant’s injury, sustained while dancing at a Christmas party given by her employer at the hotel where she worked as a waitress, and at which attendance was op[763] tional, did not arise out of and in the course of her employment. The decision dismissing the claim was affirmed. The question being one of fact and the findings being supported by evidence and free from legal error, the judge’s entry of a decree awarding compensation was wrong. In all its essentials the ease is governed by Moore’s Case, 330 Mass. 1.

Philander S. Ratzkoff for the insurer. Alphonse S. Bachorowski (David Dretler with him) for the claimant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landry's Case, 190 N.E.2d 208, 346 Mass. 762, 1963 Mass. LEXIS 749 (Mass. 1963).

190 N.E.2d 208 (Landry's Case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grant v. Brownfield's Orthopedic & Prosthetic Co.
671 P.2d 455 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1983)
Kemp's Case
437 N.E.2d 526 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1982)
Kemp's Case
428 N.E.2d 326 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1981)
Kohlmayer v. Keller
263 N.E.2d 231 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1970)
Gallart Mendía v. Industrial Commission
89 P.R. 570 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1968)
Sica v. Retail Credit Co.
227 A.2d 33 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1967)
Anderson v. Custom Caterers, Inc.
185 So. 2d 383 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1966)
Gallart Mendía v. Comisión Industrial
89 P.R. Dec. 581 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1963)