Landrum v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
Opinions
We deny certiorari. The order below, which, inter alia, provides for the autopsy of the body of the plaintiff in the event of his death during the pendency of this litigation,1 does not depart from the essential requirements of the law. Instead, the order is entirely consistent with the longstanding principle that
[657]*657“[t]he exhumation or the autopsy of a corpse, when useful to ascertain facts in litigation, should of course be performed. Reverence for the memory of those who have departed does not require us to abdicate the high duty of doing justice to the living_”
J. Wigmore, Evidence § 2221, at 197-98 (McNaughton rev. 1961) (emphasis in original).
See Esgro v. Trezza, 492 So.2d 422 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 501 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 1986). See also In re Certain Asbestos Cases, 113 F.R.D. 612 (N.D.Tex.1986); In re Certain Asbestos Cases, 112 F.R.D. 427 (N.D.Tex.1986).
Certiorari denied.
NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
535 So. 2d 656 (Landrum v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.