Landrum v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
This text of 535 So. 2d 656 (Landrum v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We deny certiorari. The order below, which, inter alia, provides for the autopsy of the body of the plaintiff in the event of his death during the pendency of this litigation,1 does not depart from the essential requirements of the law. Instead, the order is entirely consistent with the longstanding principle that
[657]*657“[t]he exhumation or the autopsy of a corpse, when useful to ascertain facts in litigation, should of course be performed. Reverence for the memory of those who have departed does not require us to abdicate the high duty of doing justice to the living_”
J. Wigmore, Evidence § 2221, at 197-98 (McNaughton rev. 1961) (emphasis in original).
See Esgro v. Trezza, 492 So.2d 422 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 501 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 1986). See also In re Certain Asbestos Cases, 113 F.R.D. 612 (N.D.Tex.1986); In re Certain Asbestos Cases, 112 F.R.D. 427 (N.D.Tex.1986).
Certiorari denied.
NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
535 So. 2d 656, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 10, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5593, 1988 WL 135677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landrum-v-armstrong-world-industries-inc-fladistctapp-1988.