Landrigan v. Stewart

Ninth Circuit

Landrigan v. Stewart

397 F.3d 1235, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2387

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 14, 2005

Docket00-99011

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 397 F.3d 1235 (Landrigan v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Landrigan v. Stewart, 397 F.3d 1235, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2387 (9th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

397 F.3d 1235

Jeffrey Timothy LANDRIGAN, a.k.a. Billy Patrick Wayne Hill, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Terry L. STEWART, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections; Dora B. Schriro, Director, Director of Arizona, Department of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 00-99011.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 14, 2005.

Dale A. Baich, Federal Public Defenders Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Kent E. Cattani, Office of the Attorney General Civil Division, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Notes:

1

Judge Silverman was recused

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI