Landrigan v. Stewart
397 F.3d 1235, 2005 WL 356798
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2005·No. 00-99011·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, 1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
1
. Judge Silverman was recused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Landrigan v. Stewart, 397 F.3d 1235, 2005 WL 356798 (9th Cir. 2005).
397 F.3d 1235 (Landrigan v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schriro v. Landrigan
550 U.S. 465 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Jeffrey Timothy Landrigan, A.K.A., Billy Patrick Wayne Hill v. Dora B. Schriro, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
441 F.3d 638 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Landrigan v. Schriro
Ninth Circuit, 2006
Landrigan v. Stewart
397 F.3d 1235 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)