Landmark Capital II, LLC v. Hameetman

5 F. App'x 751

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: March 13, 2001
• Docket: No. 99-56701; D.C. No. CV-99-03851-RSWL
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

*

Limited partnership interests in the partnerships of Cal-American Income Property Funds III, IV, VI and VII do not constitute a cognizable relevant market under 15 U.S.C. § 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. See Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 124 F.3d 430, 436 (3d Cir.1997); Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc., 576 F.Supp. 922, 927 (D.Del.1983). Therefore, Landmark II has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.