Landers v. NH Admin. Office of Courts
This text of 2004 DNH 152 (Landers v. NH Admin. Office of Courts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Landers v . NH Admin. Office of Courts CV-04-11-PB 10/13/04
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Mary Ann Landers
v. Civil N o . 04-11-PB Opinion N o . 2004 DNH 152 State of NH, Administrative Office of the Courts
O R D E R
Mary Ann Landers has sued the State of New Hampshire
Administrative Office of the Courts for relief under Title I of
the Americans with Disabilities Act. Defendant has moved to
dismiss on Eleventh Amendment grounds.
I agree that the Eleventh Amendment bars plaintiff’s claims
to the extent that she seeks damages and/or any other form of
retrospective monetary relief. See Regents of the University of
Alabama v . Garrett, 531 U.S. 356 (2001). I also agree that her
claim for reinstatement is not saved by Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S.
123 (1908) because she has brought her claim against a state
entity rather than a state official acting in an official capacity. The latter problem can be corrected by filing an
amended complaint substituting a state official acting in an
official capacity for the current institutional defendant.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted. Plaintiff shall
have 30 days to file an amended complaint for reinstatement
naming a state official as the defendant.
SO ORDERED.
Paul Barbadoro Chief Judge
October 1 3 , 2004
cc: Mary Ann Landers, pro se Andrew Livernois, Esq.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2004 DNH 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landers-v-nh-admin-office-of-courts-nhd-2004.