Landers v. NH Admin. Office of Courts

2004 DNH 152
District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided October 13, 2004·No. CV-04-11-PB·Published

Opinion

Landers v . NH Admin. Office of Courts CV-04-11-PB 10/13/04

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Mary Ann Landers

v. Civil N o . 04-11-PB Opinion N o . 2004 DNH 152 State of NH, Administrative Office of the Courts

O R D E R

Mary Ann Landers has sued the State of New Hampshire Administrative Office of the Courts for relief under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Defendant has moved to dismiss on Eleventh Amendment grounds.

I agree that the Eleventh Amendment bars plaintiff’s claims to the extent that she seeks damages and/or any other form of retrospective monetary relief. See Regents of the University of Alabama v . Garrett, 531 U.S. 356 (2001). I also agree that her claim for reinstatement is not saved by Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) because she has brought her claim against a state entity rather than a state official acting in an official

capacity. The latter problem can be corrected by filing an amended complaint substituting a state official acting in an official capacity for the current institutional defendant.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to file an amended complaint for reinstatement naming a state official as the defendant.

SO ORDERED.

Paul Barbadoro

Chief Judge

October 1 3 , 2004

cc: Mary Ann Landers, pro se Andrew Livernois, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landers v. NH Admin. Office of Courts, 2004 DNH 152 (D.N.H. 2004).

2004 DNH 152 (Landers v. NH Admin. Office of Courts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Young
209 U.S. 123 (Supreme Court, 1908)
Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett
531 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2001)