Land v. Land

165 S.E.2d 692, 4 N.C. App. 115, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1456
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 26, 1969
DocketNo. 6922SC97
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 165 S.E.2d 692 (Land v. Land) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Land v. Land, 165 S.E.2d 692, 4 N.C. App. 115, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1456 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Brock, J.

No briefs have been filed, nor was oral argument undertaken. Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, [116]*116will be taken as abandoned by him. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Failure by appellant to file a brief works an abandonment of his assignments of error, except those appearing upon the face of the record proper, which are cognizable ex mero motu. Dillard v. Brown, 233 N.C. 551, 64 S.E. 2d 843.

Error does not appear upon the face of the record.

Appeal dismissed.

Campbell and Mohsis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fitch v. Fitch
210 S.E.2d 113 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
State v. Walters
193 S.E.2d 316 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 S.E.2d 692, 4 N.C. App. 115, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/land-v-land-ncctapp-1969.