Land v. Land

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Land v. Land

165 S.E.2d 692, 4 N.C. App. 115, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1456

Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided February 26, 1969·No. No. 6922SC97·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Brock, J.

No briefs have been filed, nor was oral argument undertaken. Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, [116]*116will be taken as abandoned by him. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Failure by appellant to file a brief works an abandonment of his assignments of error, except those appearing upon the face of the record proper, which are cognizable ex mero motu. Dillard v. Brown, 233 N.C. 551, 64 S.E. 2d 843.

Error does not appear upon the face of the record.

Appeal dismissed.

Campbell and Mohsis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brock, J.

No briefs have been filed, nor was oral argument undertaken. Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, [116]*116will be taken as abandoned by him. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Failure by appellant to file a brief works an abandonment of his assignments of error, except those appearing upon the face of the record proper, which are cognizable ex mero motu. Dillard v. Brown, 233 N.C. 551, 64 S.E. 2d 843.

Error does not appear upon the face of the record.

Appeal dismissed.

Campbell and Mohsis, JJ., concur.

Land v. Land, 165 S.E.2d 692, 4 N.C. App. 115, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1456 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

165 S.E.2d 692 (Land v. Land) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related