Fitch v. Fitch

210 S.E.2d 113, 24 N.C. App. 112, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1943
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fitch v. Fitch. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 N.C. App. 570
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided December 4, 1974·No. No. 7426DC781·Published

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The appellant filed his brief on 21 October 1974 after having docketed the appeal on 19 August 1974. Under Court of Appeals Rule 28 which became effective 24 July 1974, the appellant’s brief must be filed within twenty days after the appeal is docketed. This the appellant failed to do. Consequently, the appellant is deemed to have abandoned all assignments of error except those appearing on the face of the record proper which are cognizable ex mero motu. See Land v. Land, 4 N.C. App. 115, 165 S.E. 2d 692 (1969) ; Fetherbay v. Motor Lines, 8 N.C. App. 58, 173 S.E. 2d 589 (1970). We find no error on the face of the record.

Affirmed.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Hedrick concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fitch v. Fitch, 210 S.E.2d 113, 24 N.C. App. 112, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1943 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

210 S.E.2d 113 (Fitch v. Fitch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Land v. Land
165 S.E.2d 692 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)
Fetherbay v. Sharpe Motor Lines
173 S.E.2d 589 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)