Lampley v. State

540 So. 2d 130, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 431, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 707, 1989 WL 11253
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lampley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2645
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 1989·No. No. 87-0210·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant and his co-defendant, Frederick Webster, were tried separately, and they appealed separately, using different counsel. Although the two appeals were heard by separate panels, both cases involve the critical common issue of whether second degree felony murder may properly lie. The decision of this issue in Webster v. State, 540 So.2d 124, which is also filed today, applies here as well.

Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s conviction for second degree felony murder for the reasons discussed in Webster. We have considered appellant’s remaining arguments as to his other convictions, find them to be without merit, and affirm as to them.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lampley v. State, 540 So. 2d 130, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 431, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 707, 1989 WL 11253 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

540 So. 2d 130 (Lampley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Webster v. State
540 So. 2d 124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)