Lampley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lampley v. State

540 So. 2d 130, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 431, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 707, 1989 WL 11253

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 15, 1989

DocketNo. 87-0210

StatusPublished

This text of 540 So. 2d 130 (Lampley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lampley v. State, 540 So. 2d 130, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 431, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 707, 1989 WL 11253 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant and his co-defendant, Frederick Webster, were tried separately, and they appealed separately, using different counsel. Although the two appeals were heard by separate panels, both cases involve the critical common issue of whether second degree felony murder may properly lie. The decision of this issue in Webster v. State, 540 So.2d 124, which is also filed today, applies here as well.

Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s conviction for second degree felony murder for the reasons discussed in Webster. We have considered appellant’s remaining arguments as to his other convictions, find them to be without merit, and affirm as to them.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant and his co-defendant, Frederick Webster, were tried separately, and they appealed separately, using different counsel. Although the two appeals were heard by separate panels, both cases involve the critical common issue of whether second degree felony murder may properly lie. The decision of this issue in Webster v. State, 540 So.2d 124, which is also filed today, applies here as well.

Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s conviction for second degree felony murder for the reasons discussed in Webster. We have considered appellant’s remaining arguments as to his other convictions, find them to be without merit, and affirm as to them.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 So. 2d 130, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 431, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 707, 1989 WL 11253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lampley-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack