Lamon v. Zamp

259 P. 1041, 82 Colo. 294, 1927 Colo. LEXIS 444
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided September 12, 1927·No. No. 11,902.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Me. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

Zamp had judgment for possession against Lamon before justice of the peace in unlawful detainer; Lamon appealed to county court; Zamp, as shown by the bill of exceptions, moved that the appeal be dismissed because the statutory additional bond required by C. L. sec. 6388, had not been filed. The motion was sustained and the court ordered that the appeal be dismissed and procedendo be issued. In the record proper, however, the judgment is that the cause be dismissed and procedendo be issued. Lamon brings the case here on error.

The record proper shows a judgment in his favor, but since procedendo is ordered it is manifest by this, as well as by the bill of exceptions, that the entry of judgment of dismissal of the cause was a clerical error; we therefore treat the case as if the judgment vras a dis *296 missal of the appeal. It behooves the defendant in error to have the record corrected by the county court-.

The required bond not having been filed the court was right in dismissing the appeal. Adams v. Decker, 50 Colo. 236, 114 Pac. 654; Getty v. Miller, 10 Colo. App. 331, 51 Pac. 166.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Adams not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lamon v. Zamp, 259 P. 1041, 82 Colo. 294, 1927 Colo. LEXIS 444 (Colo. 1927).

259 P. 1041 (Lamon v. Zamp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morgan v. District Court
559 P.2d 712 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1977)
General American Industries, Inc. v. County Court of Clear Creek
316 P.2d 565 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1957)
Monte Investment Co. v. Derby
103 P.2d 1065 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1940)