Lambert v. State
65 So. 3d 1139, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11349, 2011 WL 2848553
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lambert v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7035 →
Opinion
In this appeal, the defendant challenges the trial court’s ruling on his claims for postconviction relief and the amended sentencing order. We affirm, but remand for the entry of a corrected order of revocation that reflects a violation of only condition 5. See, e.g., Ortiz v. State, 2 So.3d 318, 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (recognizing that written order of revocation must conform to trial court’s oral pronouncement).
Affirmed and Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lambert v. State, 65 So. 3d 1139, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11349, 2011 WL 2848553 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
65 So. 3d 1139 (Lambert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ortiz v. State
2 So. 3d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)