Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lambert v. State

Lambert v. State

65 So. 3d 1139, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11349, 2011 WL 2848553
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 20, 2011
Docket4D08-2884
StatusPublished

This text of 65 So. 3d 1139 (Lambert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lambert v. State, 65 So. 3d 1139, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11349, 2011 WL 2848553 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, the defendant challenges the trial court’s ruling on his claims for postconviction relief and the amended sentencing order. We affirm, but remand for the entry of a corrected order of revocation that reflects a violation of only condition 5. See, e.g., Ortiz v. State, 2 So.3d 318, 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (recognizing that written order of revocation must conform to trial court’s oral pronouncement).

Affirmed and Remanded.

STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ortiz v. State
2 So. 3d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 So. 3d 1139, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11349, 2011 WL 2848553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambert-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.