Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Lambert v. Schreiber

Lambert v. Schreiber

69 A.D.3d 906, 892 N.Y.2d 796
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 26, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 A.D.3d 906 (Lambert v. Schreiber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lambert v. Schreiber, 69 A.D.3d 906, 892 N.Y.2d 796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

The order appealed from did not decide the plaintiffs motion, but instead, in effect, held it in abeyance pending a certain determination by the Brookhaven Town Planning Board. Accordingly, no appeal lies as of right from that order (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Acunto v Stewart Ave. Gardens, LLC, 26 AD3d 305 [2006]; Abrahamsen v Brockway Glass Co., 119 AD2d 612 [1986]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal in light of our determination on the companion appeal (see Lambert v Schreiber, 69 AD3d 904 [2010] [decided herewith]). Prudenti, EJ., Covello, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Superior Dental Care, P.C. v. Hoffman
81 A.D.3d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Griffin v. Marshall
80 A.D.3d 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 A.D.3d 906, 892 N.Y.2d 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambert-v-schreiber-nyappdiv-2010.