Lambert v. Commissioner
338 F.2d 4
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided October 30, 1964·No. Nos. 79-81, Dockets 28983-28985·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
We affirm the judgment of the Tax Court on the opinion of Judge Fay. Although the Commissioner might well have taken a more lenient view on the facts here presented, it is plain that the petitioners did not comply with requirements on which the Commissioner was entitled to insist.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lambert v. Commissioner, 338 F.2d 4 (2d Cir. 1964).
338 F.2d 4 (Lambert v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taylor v. Commissioner
67 T.C. 1071 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)
Hooper v. Commissioner
1974 T.C. Memo. 176 (U.S. Tax Court, 1974)
Glenn C. Bailey, Lillian S. Bailey, and Inez N. Bailey v. United States
360 F.2d 113 (Ninth Circuit, 1966)
Standard Oil Company (New Jersey) v. United States
338 F.2d 4 (Second Circuit, 1964)