Lambert v. Ackerly
169 F.3d 666, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1750, 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 677, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4119
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 9, 1999
DocketNos. 96-36017, 96-36266, 96-36267
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 169 F.3d 666 (Lambert v. Ackerly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lambert v. Ackerly, 169 F.3d 666, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1750, 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 677, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4119 (9th Cir. 1999).
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this ease be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Lambert v. Ackerly, 156 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir.1998), is withdrawn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lambert v. Ackerly
169 F.3d 666 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
169 F.3d 666, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1750, 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 677, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambert-v-ackerly-ca9-1999.