Lambert v. Ackerly
169 F.3d 666, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1750, 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 677, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4119
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 9, 1999·No. Nos. 96-36017, 96-36266, 96-36267·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this ease be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Lambert v. Ackerly, 156 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir.1998), is withdrawn.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lambert v. Ackerly, 169 F.3d 666, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1750, 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 677, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4119 (9th Cir. 1999).
169 F.3d 666 (Lambert v. Ackerly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lambert v. Ackerly
169 F.3d 666 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)