Lamb v. State
526 So. 2d 998, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1367, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2432, 1988 WL 59575
Opinion
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Because appellant’s sentence has expired, appellee moves to dismiss this appeal as moot. However, as appellant points out, the issues to be raised on appeal challenge the legality of the conviction, rather than the sentence. The-possibility of removing the stigma of a conviction represents a significant practical purpose demonstrating the continuing viability of the appeal. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lamb v. State, 526 So. 2d 998, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1367, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2432, 1988 WL 59575 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
526 So. 2d 998 (Lamb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Juan C. Casiano v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida, 2021
Turner v. State
120 So. 3d 187 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Parks v. State
96 So. 3d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
M.L.J. v. State
93 So. 3d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
AMW v. State
934 So. 2d 564 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Hagan v. State
853 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)