Lamb v. State

526 So. 2d 998, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1367, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2432, 1988 WL 59575
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 8, 1988
DocketNo. 87-2117
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 526 So. 2d 998 (Lamb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lamb v. State, 526 So. 2d 998, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1367, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2432, 1988 WL 59575 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

Because appellant’s sentence has expired, appellee moves to dismiss this appeal as moot. However, as appellant points out, the issues to be raised on appeal challenge the legality of the conviction, rather than the sentence. The-possibility of removing the stigma of a conviction represents a significant practical purpose demonstrating the continuing viability of the appeal. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is denied.

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Juan C. Casiano v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida, 2021
Turner v. State
120 So. 3d 187 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Parks v. State
96 So. 3d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
M.L.J. v. State
93 So. 3d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
AMW v. State
934 So. 2d 564 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Hagan v. State
853 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
526 So. 2d 998, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1367, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2432, 1988 WL 59575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamb-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.