Lamb v. State
This text of 526 So. 2d 998 (Lamb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Because appellant’s sentence has expired, appellee moves to dismiss this appeal as moot. However, as appellant points out, the issues to be raised on appeal challenge the legality of the conviction, rather than the sentence. The-possibility of removing the stigma of a conviction represents a significant practical purpose demonstrating the continuing viability of the appeal. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
526 So. 2d 998, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1367, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2432, 1988 WL 59575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamb-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.