Lama v. Miami-Dade County

36 So. 3d 920, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8169, 2010 WL 2292919
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 2010
Docket1D10-1467
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 So. 3d 920 (Lama v. Miami-Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lama v. Miami-Dade County, 36 So. 3d 920, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8169, 2010 WL 2292919 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s response to this Court’s show cause order of April 14, 2010, we dismiss this appeal because the order on appeal is neither a final order nor a non-final order appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.180. Here, the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC’s) order effectively purports to reserve jurisdiction on the ripe issue of medical benefits. See Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 693 So.2d 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

DISMISSED.

WOLF, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

KGW Services, Inc. v. Wilder
53 So. 3d 1219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 So. 3d 920, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8169, 2010 WL 2292919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lama-v-miami-dade-county-fladistctapp-2010.