Lama v. Miami-Dade County
36 So. 3d 920, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8169, 2010 WL 2292919
Opinion
Upon review of Appellant’s response to this Court’s show cause order of April 14, 2010, we dismiss this appeal because the order on appeal is neither a final order nor a non-final order appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.180. Here, the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC’s) order effectively purports to reserve jurisdiction on the ripe issue of medical benefits. See Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 693 So.2d 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lama v. Miami-Dade County, 36 So. 3d 920, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8169, 2010 WL 2292919 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
36 So. 3d 920 (Lama v. Miami-Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
KGW Services, Inc. v. Wilder
53 So. 3d 1219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)