KGW Services, Inc. v. Wilder

53 So. 3d 1219, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1573, 2011 WL 479987
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 2011·No. No. 1D10-4266·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellants’ response to this court’s December 1, 2010, order to show cause, we conclude the order on appeal is a non-appealable, nonfinal order because it specifically reserves jurisdiction on ripe claims for adjustment of the average weekly wage and temporary disability benefits. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1); Lama v. Miami-Dade County, 36 So.3d 920 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (dismissing appeal from order reserving jurisdiction on ripe issue of medical benefits); Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck Co., 693 So.2d 680, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (stating where the JCC reserves ruling on claim that is ripe for adjudication, order is not yet final or appealable). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

BENTON, C.J., DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KGW Services, Inc. v. Wilder, 53 So. 3d 1219, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1573, 2011 WL 479987 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

53 So. 3d 1219 (KGW Services, Inc. v. Wilder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
693 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Lama v. Miami-Dade County
36 So. 3d 920 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)