KGW Services, Inc. v. Wilder

District Court of Appeal of Florida

KGW Services, Inc. v. Wilder

53 So. 3d 1219, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1573, 2011 WL 479987

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 11, 2011

DocketNo. 1D10-4266

StatusPublished

This text of 53 So. 3d 1219 (KGW Services, Inc. v. Wilder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

KGW Services, Inc. v. Wilder, 53 So. 3d 1219, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1573, 2011 WL 479987 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellants’ response to this court’s December 1, 2010, order to show cause, we conclude the order on appeal is a non-appealable, nonfinal order because it specifically reserves jurisdiction on ripe claims for adjustment of the average weekly wage and temporary disability benefits. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1); Lama v. Miami-Dade County, 36 So.3d 920 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (dismissing appeal from order reserving jurisdiction on ripe issue of medical benefits); Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck Co., 693 So.2d 680, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (stating where the JCC reserves ruling on claim that is ripe for adjudication, order is not yet final or appealable). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

BENTON, C.J., DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellants’ response to this court’s December 1, 2010, order to show cause, we conclude the order on appeal is a non-appealable, nonfinal order because it specifically reserves jurisdiction on ripe claims for adjustment of the average weekly wage and temporary disability benefits. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1); Lama v. Miami-Dade County, 36 So.3d 920 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (dismissing appeal from order reserving jurisdiction on ripe issue of medical benefits); Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck Co., 693 So.2d 680, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (stating where the JCC reserves ruling on claim that is ripe for adjudication, order is not yet final or appealable). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

BENTON, C.J., DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 So. 3d 1219, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1573, 2011 WL 479987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kgw-services-inc-v-wilder-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack