Lake v. Bonynge

232 U.S. 715, 34 S. Ct. 330, 58 L. Ed. 812, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 943
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 19, 1914·No. No. 680·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of: First. Pomeroy’s Lessee v. State Bank of Indiana, 1 Wall. 592, 597; New Orleans & Northeastern R. R. Co. v. Jopes, 142 U. S. 18, 22; Ward v. Joslin, 186 U. S. 142, 153; Holt v. United States, 218 U. S. 245. Second. Arkansas Southern R. R. Co. v. German National Bank, 207 U. S. 270; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. State of Texas, 212 U. S. 112.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake v. Bonynge, 232 U.S. 715, 34 S. Ct. 330, 58 L. Ed. 812, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 943 (1914).

232 U.S. 715 (Lake v. Bonynge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Silva
114 Cal. App. 3d 538 (California Court of Appeal, 1981)