Lake Erie Lumber & Supply Co. v. Marshall

11 Ohio App. 416, 30 Ohio C.A. 399, 1919 Ohio App. LEXIS 192
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided July 7, 1919·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

In this cause, which is here heard upon appeal, we hold that the sending of a carbon copy of the affidavit to obtain a lien, which copy is in all respects a duplicate of the original excepting only that it lacks the name of the affiant at the end of the affidavit and the name of the notary at the end of the jurat, accompanied by a letter to the owner stating that the same is a copy of the affidavit filed, all of which is done within the thirty-day period provided for in Section 8315, General Code, is a sufficient compliance with the [417] provisions of said section requiring service on the owner or his agent of a copy thereof. The lien of The Lake Erie Lumber & Supply Company will, therefore, be sustained.

In reference to the claim of the R. L. Quiesser Company, the validity of its lien depends upon a question of fact. Without going into an analysis of the evidence, it will be sufficient to say that the court finds that the evidence preponderates in favor of the sustaining of the claim of said company, and we hold that the said R. L. Quiesser Company has a valid lien.

A journal entry may. be drawn sustaining these two liens and the claims of all the cross-petitioners in the court below, just as was done by the common pleas court.

Judgment accordingly.

Dunlap, P. J., Washburn and Vickery, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake Erie Lumber & Supply Co. v. Marshall, 11 Ohio App. 416, 30 Ohio C.A. 399, 1919 Ohio App. LEXIS 192 (Ohio Ct. App. 1919).

11 Ohio App. 416 (Lake Erie Lumber & Supply Co. v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leeson v. Bartol
99 P.2d 485 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1940)
Acorn Supply Co. v. Fingerhut
6 Ohio Law. Abs. 588 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1928)