Laird v. Giffin

54 N.W. 584, 84 Wis. 286, 1893 Wisc. LEXIS 58
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided February 21, 1893·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Cassoday, J.

The judgment appealed from is to the ef-feqt that the plaintiff should have $155.95 of the moneys so deposited, on condition that the garnishee should have the balance thereof to remunerate him for the costs which the plaintiff had unnecessarily forced him to incur. The appeal is “from the judgment, . . .' and,from the whole and every part thereof.” The garnishee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that by accepting the money on the portion of the judgment in his favor the plaintiff thereby waived his right to appeal from the whole judgment. We are constrained to hold that this motion must be granted, for the reasons stated in Webster-Glover L. & M. Co. v. St. Croix Co. 71 Wis. 317, and cases there cited. See, also, Smith v. Coleman, 77 Wis. 348. Especially should such rule prevail where, as here, the mcineys so applied are exempt from execution (subd. 17, sec. 2982, S. & B. Ann. Stats.), and the principal defendant has waived such exemption in order to prevent further litigation, and such waiver has been incorporated into the judgment appealed from. .

By the Court.— The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laird v. Giffin, 54 N.W. 584, 84 Wis. 286, 1893 Wisc. LEXIS 58 (Wis. 1893).

54 N.W. 584 (Laird v. Giffin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mastin v. May
153 N.W. 756 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1915)
Black v. Black
79 P. 554 (Montana Supreme Court, 1905)
Drake v. Scheunemann
79 N.W. 749 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1899)
Fiedler v. Howard
75 N.W. 163 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1898)
Tyler v. Shea
61 N.W. 468 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)