Drake v. Scheunemann

79 N.W. 749, 103 Wis. 458, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 222
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided June 22, 1899·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Maeshall, J.

The order is not appealable if for no other reason, because it is subject to review on appeal from the judgment. The right of appeal from an intermediate order ceases on the entry of judgment. American B. H., O. & S. M. Co. v. Gurnee, 38 Wis. 533; Donkle v. Milem, 88 Wis. 33.

The order was granted upon condition of the payment of plaintiff’s witness fees on the appearance at the time the cause was dismissed. Acceptance of the fees by plaintiff’s attorneys, and going to trial on the merits without objection, waived any error in the order. That has been repeatedly decided by this court, as evidenced by numerous cases cited by respondents’ counsel. Cogswell v. Colley, 22 Wis. 399; Webster-Glover L. & M. Co. v. St. Croix Co. 71 Wis. 317; [460] Smith v. Coleman, 77 Wis. 343; McKinnon v. Wolfenden, 78 Wis. 237; Laird v. Giffin, 84 Wis. 286; Mills v. Nat. F. Ins. Co. 92 Wis. 90; Cook v. McComb, 98 Wis. 526. That requires an affirmance of the judgment.

By the Court.— The judgment of the superior court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drake v. Scheunemann, 79 N.W. 749, 103 Wis. 458, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 222 (Wis. 1899).

79 N.W. 749 (Drake v. Scheunemann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
203 N.W.2d 34 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1973)
Seagram-Distillers Corp. v. Lang
41 N.W.2d 429 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1950)
Leibowitz v. Leibowitz
14 N.W.2d 2 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1944)
Huyler v. Kohn
153 S.E. 460 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1930)
Harcum v. Benson
160 N.W. 80 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1916)
Price v. Grzyll
114 N.W. 100 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1907)
Ullman v. State
100 N.W. 818 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1904)
Heinemann v. Pier
85 N.W. 646 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1901)