Lainez v. New York State Department of Corrections

Opinion

fispesony UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT pBOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK P ELECT RONICALLY FILED ROGER LAINDD es DOC # □□□□ “R LATINEZ, □ TST] i Plaintiff, BATE FILED pola _| ~against- ~~ "18 CIVIL 6754 (VB)

JUDGMENT AMY ROYCROFT, ASHLEY HARRIS- BAKER, JEANETTE BARRET-WILSON, JULIO MARTINEZ, and STEPHANIE O’SULLIVAN, Defendants. cance nee eee XK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated November 25, 2019, to date, plaintiff has failed to file a second amended complaint or seek an extension of time to do so. As the Court has already dismissed all of plaintiffs' claims, judgment is entered in defendants' favor. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York November 27, 2019

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court MLAAgo Deputy Cler