laim of Ezeckel v. Saperstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

laim of Ezeckel v. Saperstein

225 A.D. 836

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 225 A.D. 836 (laim of Ezeckel v. Saperstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

laim of Ezeckel v. Saperstein, 225 A.D. 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Award reversed, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that it covers three injuries for which compensation is made to run consecutively. (Matter of Hoffman v. Chatham E. L., H. & P. Co., 249 N. Y. 433.) The claim is remitted for the Board to take proof whether a binder was issued by the insurance carrier, and if so its effect, and to determine what if any award should be made as against the employer and carrier. Van Kirk, P. J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Award reversed, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that it covers three injuries for which compensation is made to run consecutively. (Matter of Hoffman v. Chatham E. L., H. & P. Co., 249 N. Y. 433.) The claim is remitted for the Board to take proof whether a binder was issued by the insurance carrier, and if so its effect, and to determine what if any award should be made as against the employer and carrier. Van Kirk, P. J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 A.D. 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laim-of-ezeckel-v-saperstein-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack