laim of Ezeckel v. Saperstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

laim of Ezeckel v. Saperstein

225 A.D. 836

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1929·Published

Opinion

Award reversed, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that it covers three injuries for which compensation is made to run consecutively. (Matter of Hoffman v. Chatham E. L., H. & P. Co., 249 N. Y. 433.) The claim is remitted for the Board to take proof whether a binder was issued by the insurance carrier, and if so its effect, and to determine what if any award should be made as against the employer and carrier. Van Kirk, P. J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Award reversed, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that it covers three injuries for which compensation is made to run consecutively. (Matter of Hoffman v. Chatham E. L., H. & P. Co., 249 N. Y. 433.) The claim is remitted for the Board to take proof whether a binder was issued by the insurance carrier, and if so its effect, and to determine what if any award should be made as against the employer and carrier. Van Kirk, P. J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.

laim of Ezeckel v. Saperstein, 225 A.D. 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

225 A.D. 836 (laim of Ezeckel v. Saperstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related