Claim of Hoffman v. Chatham Electric Light, Heat & Power Co.

164 N.E. 341, 249 N.Y. 433, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 826
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 4, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 164 N.E. 341 (Claim of Hoffman v. Chatham Electric Light, Heat & Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Hoffman v. Chatham Electric Light, Heat & Power Co., 164 N.E. 341, 249 N.Y. 433, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 826 (N.Y. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under our ruling in Matter of Marhoffer v. Marhoffer (220 N. Y. 543) awards for injuries may not properly be consecutive.

The question of the application of subdivision 3-u of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67) is not before us on these appeals.

The orders should be affirmed with costs against the State Industrial Board and the questions certified answered in the negative.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Orders affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mizrahi's Case
71 N.E.2d 383 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1947)
Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. v. Monahan
54 F.2d 349 (First Circuit, 1931)
Nelson v. Service Oil Co.
238 N.W. 525 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1931)
Claim of Flicker v. Mac Sign Co.
227 A.D. 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Claim of Carolan v. R. Hoe & Co.
225 A.D. 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
laim of Ezeckel v. Saperstein
225 A.D. 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 N.E. 341, 249 N.Y. 433, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hoffman-v-chatham-electric-light-heat-power-co-ny-1928.