Laiche v. Martin
11 Teiss. 96, 1914 La. App. LEXIS 12
Opinions
On Application for Rehearing.
For the reasons assigned in the original opinion herein, our former decree is reinstated and now made the final judgment of the Court.
I dissent. ' I think that an appeal made returnable before the time allowed the appellee to answer and before the time allowed appellant to complete it by filing his bond is not made returnable .according to law. Hence an appeal if made “returnable according to law” is returnable on the first return day after said delays and not on the next return day after signing the order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Laiche v. Martin, 11 Teiss. 96, 1914 La. App. LEXIS 12 (La. Ct. App. 1914).
11 Teiss. 96 (Laiche v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown University v. Granger
36 A. 824 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1897)
Nelson's Estate
23 A. 373 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1892)
Lopes v. Sahuque
38 So. 810 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)
Mix v. Hawkins
38 So. 877 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1905)
Hays v. Mayer
42 So. 505 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1906)
Brooks v. Smith
43 So. 399 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1907)
Welch v. Smith
43 So. 400 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1907)
Carrol v. Magee
43 So. 400 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1907)
State v. Douglas
45 So. 517 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1908)
Boudreaux v. Boudreaux
47 So. 758 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1908)
Keplinger v. Barrow
61 So. 217 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)
Brugier v. Railroad Commission
61 So. 415 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)
Vasquez v. Vasquez
62 So. 123 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)
Laiche v. Martin
66 So. 226 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1914)
Mayor of Westminster v. Shipley
13 A. 365 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1888)
Clendenin v. Maryland Constuction Co.
37 A. 709 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1897)