Boudreaux v. Boudreaux
47 So. 758, 122 La. 433, 1908 La. LEXIS 478
Opinion
On- Motion to Dismiss.
The transcript having been filed more than three days after the return day, and there being a motion to dismiss, the appeal must, be dismissed. Code Prac. art. 594; Laussade v. Maury, 31 La. Ann. 858.
The motion to dismiss was filed more than three days after the filing of the transcript; but a motion to dismiss, based on the tardy filing of the transcript, need not be filed within the three days following the filing of the transcript. Hudson v. Garrett, Sheriff, 47 La. Ann. 1534, 18 South. 510.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boudreaux v. Boudreaux, 47 So. 758, 122 La. 433, 1908 La. LEXIS 478 (La. 1908).
47 So. 758 (Boudreaux v. Boudreaux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Danna v. Yazoo M v. R. Co.
154 So. 365 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)
Klumpp v. Fontenot
122 So. 503 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1929)
Whitney Central Trust & Savings Bank v. Greenwood Planting & Mfg. Co.
83 So. 834 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1920)
Laiche v. Martin
11 Teiss. 96 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1914)
Abraham v. Wallenberg
58 So. 895 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1912)
Girod v. Monroe Brick Co.
52 So. 550 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1910)