Lahm v. Bloomberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lahm v. Bloomberg

29 A.D.3d 461, 817 N.Y.S.2d 5

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 25, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 A.D.3d 461 (Lahm v. Bloomberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lahm v. Bloomberg, 29 A.D.3d 461, 817 N.Y.S.2d 5 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

[462]*462Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Kibbie F. Payne, J.), entered April 29, 2004, which granted petitioner’s application to annul respondent’s determination denying him accidental disability retirement benefits and awarded petitioner such benefits, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition denied and the proceeding dismissed. Order, same court and Justice, entered May 16, 2005, which denied petitioner’s application to hold respondents in civil contempt, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Given the credible medical evidence in the record that petitioner’s cancer did not result from his exposure to dust, smoke and debris at the time of the collapse of the World Trade Center and its aftermath, the Board of Trustees’ denial of accidental disability retirement benefits had a rational basis. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Sullivan and Malone, JJ. [See 4 Misc 3d 530 (2004).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[462]*462Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Kibbie F. Payne, J.), entered April 29, 2004, which granted petitioner’s application to annul respondent’s determination denying him accidental disability retirement benefits and awarded petitioner such benefits, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition denied and the proceeding dismissed. Order, same court and Justice, entered May 16, 2005, which denied petitioner’s application to hold respondents in civil contempt, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Given the credible medical evidence in the record that petitioner’s cancer did not result from his exposure to dust, smoke and debris at the time of the collapse of the World Trade Center and its aftermath, the Board of Trustees’ denial of accidental disability retirement benefits had a rational basis. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Sullivan and Malone, JJ. [See 4 Misc 3d 530 (2004).]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.3d 461, 817 N.Y.S.2d 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lahm-v-bloomberg-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack