Lafayette Brass Co. v. United States
This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 798 (Lafayette Brass Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance witb stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of parts, in chief value of metal, of lawn sprinklers, dedicated for use on such lawn sprinklers, similar in all material respects to those the subject of The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of nozzles in chief value of brass, similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Lipman’s (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 Cust. Ct. 798, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lafayette-brass-co-v-united-states-cusc-1966.