Lafayette Brass Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Lafayette Brass Co. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 798, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1404

United States Customs Court·Decided August 1, 1966·No. No. P66/177·Published

Opinion

Eao, C. J.

In accordance witb stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of parts, in chief value of metal, of lawn sprinklers, dedicated for use on such lawn sprinklers, similar in all material respects to those the subject of The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of nozzles in chief value of brass, similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Lipman’s (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eao, C. J.

In accordance witb stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of parts, in chief value of metal, of lawn sprinklers, dedicated for use on such lawn sprinklers, similar in all material respects to those the subject of The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of nozzles in chief value of brass, similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Lipman’s (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Lafayette Brass Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 798, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1404 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

57 Cust. Ct. 798 (Lafayette Brass Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.