Ladd v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ladd v. State

1966 OK CR 69, 414 P.2d 723, 1966 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 191

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 25, 1966

DocketNo. A-13835

StatusPublished

This text of 1966 OK CR 69 (Ladd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ladd v. State, 1966 OK CR 69, 414 P.2d 723, 1966 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 191 (Okla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.

Donald Leon Ladd, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged by Information in the District Court of Tulsa County with the crime of Driving While Intoxicated, Second Offense. He was tried by the court who found him guilty and assessed his punishment at one year in the State Penitentiary, a fine of $10.00 and costs. A timely appeal was thereafter perfected to. this Court. No brief having been filed on behalf of defendant, this cause was submitted on the record on February 14, 1966,. under Rule 9 of this Court which provides:

“When briefs are not filed, or when an appearance is not made, the cause will be submitted and examined for fundamental error only.”

See Ashby v. State, Okl.Cr., 406 P.2d 1007; and Bales v. State, Okl.Cr., 406 P.2d 1010.

We have carefully examined the record and finding it free of fundamental error,, are of the opinion that the judgment and sentence appealed from should be, and the same is hereby,

Affirmed.

NIX and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.

Donald Leon Ladd, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged by Information in the District Court of Tulsa County with the crime of Driving While Intoxicated, Second Offense. He was tried by the court who found him guilty and assessed his punishment at one year in the State Penitentiary, a fine of $10.00 and costs. A timely appeal was thereafter perfected to. this Court. No brief having been filed on behalf of defendant, this cause was submitted on the record on February 14, 1966,. under Rule 9 of this Court which provides:

“When briefs are not filed, or when an appearance is not made, the cause will be submitted and examined for fundamental error only.”

See Ashby v. State, Okl.Cr., 406 P.2d 1007; and Bales v. State, Okl.Cr., 406 P.2d 1010.

We have carefully examined the record and finding it free of fundamental error,, are of the opinion that the judgment and sentence appealed from should be, and the same is hereby,

Affirmed.

NIX and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1966 OK CR 69, 414 P.2d 723, 1966 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ladd-v-state-oklacrimapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack