Bales v. State
This text of 1965 OK CR 123 (Bales v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lloyd Ivan Bales was charged, tried and convicted in the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma for the offense of indecent exposure, and from the judgment and sentence rendered against him, he appeals.
No brief having been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error, his cause was submitted the 24th day of September, 1965 under Rule 9 of this Court which provides:
“When briefs are not filed, or when an appearance is not made, the cause will be submitted and examined for fundamental error only.”
We have carefully examined the record in the instant case and are of the opinion that the evidence, although conflicting, amply supports the verdict of the jury, and that the court fairly and fully instructed the jury, and that the record is free of fundamental error.
We are therefore of the opinion that the judgment and sentence appealed from should, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1965 OK CR 123, 406 P.2d 1010, 1965 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bales-v-state-oklacrimapp-1965.