Ladd-Hannon Oil Corp. v. Tripplehorn

13 S.W.2d 666, 118 Tex. 195, 1929 Tex. LEXIS 87
Texas Supreme Court·Decided January 30, 1929·No. Application No. 16288.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The certified copy of the orders of the Court of Civil Appeals in the record before ns shows that the motion for rehearing in that court was overruled June 18, 1928. The application for writ of error was filed in the Court of Civil Appeals on July 20, 1928, more than 30 days after the motion for rehearing was overruled. We therefore have no jurisdiction of the application. Article 1742, R. S. 1925. Flattery v. Miller (Tex. Sup.) 212 S. W. 932; Long v. Martin, 112 Tex. 365, 247 S. W. 827; Schleicher v. Runge, 90 Tex. 456, 39 S. W. 279; Allen v. Comoras, 114 Tex. 581, 278 S. W. 1114.

The application is accordingly dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ladd-Hannon Oil Corp. v. Tripplehorn, 13 S.W.2d 666, 118 Tex. 195, 1929 Tex. LEXIS 87 (Tex. 1929).

13 S.W.2d 666 (Ladd-Hannon Oil Corp. v. Tripplehorn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rawdon v. Garvie
227 S.W.2d 261 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Givens v. Woodward
208 S.W.2d 363 (Texas Supreme Court, 1948)
Reynolds v. Dallas County
207 S.W.2d 362 (Texas Supreme Court, 1948)
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Perkins
48 S.W.2d 249 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1932)