Flattery v. Miller

212 S.W. 932, 1919 Tex. LEXIS 132
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJune 11, 1919
DocketNo. 2784
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 212 S.W. 932 (Flattery v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flattery v. Miller, 212 S.W. 932, 1919 Tex. LEXIS 132 (Tex. 1919).

Opinion

PHILLIPS, C. J.

Since our reference of this case to the Commission of Appeals it has come to our attention that the petition for, writ of error was filed in the Court of Civil Appeals more than thirty days after the overruling by that court of the motion for rehearing. The motion for rehearing was overruled on December 3, 1914. The petition for writ of error was filed in the Court of Civil Appeals on January 4, 1915.

In order for the Supreme Court to have jurisdiction to grant a writ of error, the petition for the writ must be filed in the Court of Civil Appeals within thirty days from the overruling of the motion for rehearing. This is a plain and positive jurisdictional requirement. Schleicher v. Runge, 90 Tex. 456, 39 S. W. 279; Vinson v. Carter, 106 Tex. 273, 166 S. W. 363. The case must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It is withdrawn from the Commission and so dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reynolds v. Dallas County
207 S.W.2d 362 (Texas Supreme Court, 1948)
Heney v. Davidson
32 S.W.2d 452 (Texas Supreme Court, 1930)
Ladd-Hannon Oil Corp. v. Tripplehorn
118 Tex. 195 (Texas Supreme Court, 1929)
El Jardin Immigration Co. v. Karlan
247 S.W. 671 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Long v. Martin
247 S.W. 827 (Texas Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 S.W. 932, 1919 Tex. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flattery-v-miller-tex-1919.