LaCorte Electrical Construction & Maintenance, Inc. v. County of Rensselaer

195 A.D.2d 923, 600 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7644
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 29, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 195 A.D.2d 923 (LaCorte Electrical Construction & Maintenance, Inc. v. County of Rensselaer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LaCorte Electrical Construction & Maintenance, Inc. v. County of Rensselaer, 195 A.D.2d 923, 600 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Spain, J.), entered April 2, 1992 in Rensselaer County, which, inter alia, dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Rensselaer County Legislature awarding an electrical contract to respondent Schenectady Hardware and Electric, Inc.

On this appeal, petitioner contends that as the lowest bidder it was wrongfully deprived by the Rensselaer County Legislature of the contract for the electrical work to be performed on the County Public Safety Building in the City of Troy. The issues involved were adequately addressed by Supreme Court in a decision which denied petitioner’s requested relief in all respects. We agree with the determination rendered and affirm for the reasons stated in Supreme Court’s decision. We add only that a bidder’s honesty, integrity, good faith and fair dealing are valid considerations regarding whether a lowest bidder is a responsible bidder, and a criminal investigation or indictment can provide a rational basis for finding that such bidder is not responsible (see, Matter of Schiavone Constr. Co. v Larocca, 117 AD2d 440, 443, lv denied 68 NY2d 610; see also, Matter of LaCorte Elec. Constr. & Maintenance v County of Rensselaer, 80 NY2d 232, 236). Petitioner’s prior felony conviction and willful violations of the Labor Law overcome its claim of bias and provide a rational basis for the County Legislature’s determination that petitioner was not a responsible bidder (see, Matter of Schiavone Constr. Co. v Larocca, supra, at 444).

Weiss, P. J., Mercure and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prote Contracting Co. v. New York City School Construction Authority
248 A.D.2d 693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
DeFoe Corp. v. New York City Department of Transportation
665 N.E.2d 158 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
Matter v. City of Cohoes
221 A.D.2d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Tully Construction Co. v. Hevesi
214 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Bay Harbour Electric, Inc. v. County of Chautauqua
210 A.D.2d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 A.D.2d 923, 600 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacorte-electrical-construction-maintenance-inc-v-county-of-rensselaer-nyappdiv-1993.