Lackman v. Blazin Wings, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California·Decided August 6, 2020·No. 3:20-cv-01256·Unknown

Opinion

CASSANDRA LACKMAN, Case No.: 3:20-cv-1256-BEN-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE EARLY NEUTRAL v. EVALUATION AND CASE BLAZIN WINGS, INC.; BUFFALO MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILD WINGS, INC.; and INSPIRE BRANDS, INC., [ECF No. 8] Defendants.

This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Continue the Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”) and Case Management Conference (“CMC”), filed on August 6, 2020. ECF No. 8. On July 9, 2020, the Court scheduled the ENE and CMC in this matter for September 8, 2020 before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. ECF No. 6. However, defense counsel is unavailable to attend the ENE on that date due to a previously scheduled family vacation. See ECF No. 8-1, James Decl. Upon due consideration, the Court finds good cause to GRANT the Joint Motion (ECF No. 8). Accordingly, the ENE and CMC are hereby RESET for October 9, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. As before, the ENE will take place via videoconference for all attendees. The Court issues the following Mandatory Procedures to be followed in preparation for the ENE: 1. Purpose of the Conference: The purpose of the ENE is to permit an informal discussion between the attorneys and the settlement judge of every aspect of the lawsuit in an effort to achieve an early resolution of the case. All conference discussions will be informal, off the record, and confidential. 2. Full Settlement Authority Required: A party or party representative with full and complete authority to enter into a binding settlement must be present via videoconference or immediately available to join. Full authority to settle means that a person must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485–86 (D. Ariz. 2003). Limited or sum certain authority is not adequate. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595–97 (8th Cir. 2001). A person who needs to call another person who is not present on the videoconference before agreeing to any settlement does not have full authority. 3. Confidential ENE Statements Required: No later than October 5, 2020, the parties shall submit confidential statements of five (5) pages or less directly to the chambers of Magistrate Judge Goddard outlining the nature of the case, the claims, and the defenses. These statements shall not be filed or served on opposing counsel. They shall be lodged via email at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov. The ENE statement is limited to five (5) pages or less, and up to five (5) pages of exhibits or declarations. Each party’s ENE statement must outline: A. the nature of the case and the claims, B. position on liability or defense, C. position regarding settlement of the case with a specific demand/offer for settlement,2 and D. any previous settlement negotiations or mediation efforts. 4. Case Management Conference: In the event the case does not settle at the ENE, the Court will immediately thereafter hold a Case Management Conference (“CMC”) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 16(b). Appearance of the parties at the CMC is not required. The Court orders the following to occur before the CMC: A. The parties must meet and confer pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) no later than September 18, 2020. B. The parties must file a Joint Case Management Statement by September 29, 2020. The Joint Case Management Statement must address all points in the “Joint Case Management Statement Requirements for Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard,” which can be found at: https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/Judges/goddard/docs/Goddard%20Join t%20Case%20Management%20Statement%20Rules.pdf. C. Initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A-D) must occur by October 2, 2020. 5. Appearances via Videoconference Required: All named parties, party representatives, including claims adjusters for insured defendants, as well as principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation must attend the ENE via videoconference. All who attend the ENE must be legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case.

1 A general statement, such as that a party “will negotiate in good faith,” is a not a specific demand or offer.

2 If a specific demand or offer cannot be made at the time the ENE statement is submitted, then the reasons as to why a demand or offer cannot be made must be stated. Further, the Counsel appearing without their clients (whether or not counsel has been given settlement authority) will be subject to immediate imposition of sanctions. To facilitate the videoconference ENE, the Court hereby orders as follows: A. The Court will use its official Zoom video conferencing account to hold the ENE. If you are unfamiliar with Zoom: Zoom is available on computers through a download on the Zoom website (https://zoom.us/meetings) or on mobile devices through the installation of a free app.3 Joining a Zoom conference does not require creating a Zoom account, but it does require downloading the .exe file (if using a computer) or the app (if using a mobile device). Participants are encouraged to create an account, install Zoom and familiarize themselves with Zoom in advance of the ENE.4 There is a cost-free option for creating a Zoom account. B. Prior to the start of the ENE, the Court will email each participant an invitation to join a Zoom video conference. Again, if possible, participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the video conference, as mobile devices often offer inferior performance. Participants shall join the video conference by following the ZoomGov Meeting hyperlink in the invitation. Participants who do not have Zoom already installed on their device when they click on the ZoomGov Meeting hyperlink will be prompted to download and install Zoom before proceeding. Zoom may then prompt participants

3 If possible, participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the video conference, rather than mobile devices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lackman v. Blazin Wings, Inc., (S.D. Cal. 2020).

Lackman v. Blazin Wings, Inc. (Lackman v. Blazin Wings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related