Lachman Co. v. Central California Berry Growers' Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Lachman Co. v. Central California Berry Growers' Ass'n

58 Cal. App. 794

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedAugust 12, 1922

DocketCiv. No. 4241

StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cal. App. 794 (Lachman Co. v. Central California Berry Growers' Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lachman Co. v. Central California Berry Growers' Ass'n, 58 Cal. App. 794 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

LANGDON, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order denying the motion of the defendant T. Toyoshima to change the place of trial of the action from the city and county of San Francisco to San Benito County, the residence of said defendant.

By stipulation and order heretofore made herein, this appeal is considered upon the transcript and briefs on file in this court in the ease of The Lachman Company v. Central California Berry Growers’ Assn, et al., ante, p. 748 [209 Pac. 379], The essential facts are identical in the two cases, and for the reasons given in the opinion filed in said case of The Lachman Company v. Central California Berry Growers’ Assn., the order appealed from herein is reversed, with directions to the trial court to grant the motion of defendant Toyoshima to change the place of trial of the action to the county of his residence.

Nourse, J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LANGDON, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order denying the motion of the defendant T. Toyoshima to change the place of trial of the action from the city and county of San Francisco to San Benito County, the residence of said defendant.

By stipulation and order heretofore made herein, this appeal is considered upon the transcript and briefs on file in this court in the ease of The Lachman Company v. Central California Berry Growers’ Assn, et al., ante, p. 748 [209 Pac. 379], The essential facts are identical in the two cases, and for the reasons given in the opinion filed in said case of The Lachman Company v. Central California Berry Growers’ Assn., the order appealed from herein is reversed, with directions to the trial court to grant the motion of defendant Toyoshima to change the place of trial of the action to the county of his residence.

Nourse, J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 Cal. App. 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lachman-co-v-central-california-berry-growers-assn-calctapp-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack