Lacey v. Beaudry
53 Cal. 693
Opinion
Without considering the defective averments of the complaint, it is enough to say that among the many errors occurring at the trial, one of the most prominent was the giving of the second instruction requested by plaintiff, which was to the effect that the defendant Beaudry, by the mere “ issuance and service ” of an injunction, converted to his own use certain property on premises then in the possession of the present plaintiff.
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial. Bemittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lacey v. Beaudry, 53 Cal. 693 (Cal. 1879).
53 Cal. 693 (Lacey v. Beaudry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
R. Muñiz de León & Co., (S. en C.) v. Melón Hnos. & Cia., (S. en C.)
56 P.R. 314 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1940)
Serrallés Galiano v. Saurí Tristani
44 P.R. 390 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1933)
Blumenthal v. Maryland Casualty Co.
6 P.2d 965 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Blanchard v. Ladd
67 P. 131 (California Supreme Court, 1901)
Felcher v. McMillan
61 N.W. 791 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)