Lacey Sivak v. Timothy Wilson

Ninth Circuit

Lacey Sivak v. Timothy Wilson

646 F. App'x 523

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 25, 2016

Docket14-35877

StatusUnpublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 646 F. App'x 523 (Lacey Sivak v. Timothy Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lacey Sivak v. Timothy Wilson, 646 F. App'x 523 (9th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

*524 MEMORANDUM **

Lacey Mark Sivak, an Idaho state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his request to file various actions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the application of a vexatious litigant order. Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in revising a prior pre-filing order to conform to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and in applying the revised order to Sivak’s proposed actions.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI