Lacaze v. Warden Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women

647 F.3d 1175, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17670, 2011 WL 3300677
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 2, 2011·No. 08-30477·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. No member of the panel nor judge in regular active service of the court having requested that the court be polled on Rehearing En Banc (Fed. R.App. and 5th Cir. R. 35), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

The opinion is amended as follows. The sentence that previously read: “But even that standard, which requires that the evidence probably undermined the result, is not the same as the lesser standard in Kyles, which requires only that the evidence could have undermined the result” is hereby removed from the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lacaze v. Warden Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women, 647 F.3d 1175, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17670, 2011 WL 3300677 (5th Cir. 2011).

647 F.3d 1175 (Lacaze v. Warden Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Morgan
635 F. App'x 423 (Tenth Circuit, 2015)